The global economic crisis in three easy lessons (you missed me, didn’t you?)
Regarding health care reform, I wasn’t on a warpath months ago when it was the topic du jour, but I was close. Today, it’s financial regulation. I’m fascinated and repelled, at the same time, by the economic meltdown and its causes. I’ve been compelled to break it down into terms I can grasp and, having done so, am angry and disappointed in my historic belief that there was nothing I could have done personally to stop it. That’s not hubris, or lack thereof. Human beings who put their pants on one leg at a time, just like you and me, created this mess. With a shared voice, those of us who cocked our heads and asked, “Can they do that?” or thought, “Dick and Jane and their friends can’t afford to buy those houses,” could’ve chosen to speak up loud and clear to those in authority and registered our concerns. I didn’t. Did you?
“Never doubt that a small group of committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” – Margaret Mead
Unfortunately, the mess is the mess. Going forward, we can only hope to learn from the economic collapse and try not to let it happen again. But let’s back up for a minute (or ten or twenty) and talk about how it happened. And stay with me. I’m sorting it out as I go along.
None of this global economic debacle matters a wit unless we understand how it personally affects us and/or our neighbors. We care about our neighbors, yes?
Okay, so Dick and Jane want to buy a house for $1 million. Forget that they’re underemployed and that their income can’t support a jumbo loan. Put aside the fact that they have no money to put down on the house. The Bank of Bubba wants to give them a loan because loans make money for the bank through interest accrued over the 15 to 30 years Dick and Jane will take to pay the money bank. They give Dick and Jane the $1 million, who in turn give it to Dave, the developer, or Henry, the homeowner. In other words, the Bank of Bubba is out $1 million and Dave or Henry puts it in their pocket. Many have conspired to inflate the value of Dick and Jane’s home, while others have been stupid enough to think that housing prices would continue to rise at ridiculous rates until the end of time.
For the simplicity of this post, one of two things happened. Either the Bank of Bubba kept the loan and watched as Dick and Jane continued to fall behind in their mortgage payments, or they bundled the loan up with a hundred other mortgages (say each one was for $1 million) and sold them to outside investors. We’ll call one outside investor The Bank of Yang, headquartered in China. They agreed to pay Bubba ten thousand dollars over the $1 million per loan (these are random numbers, but the concept is sound) because the Bank of Yang believed, ultimately, the loans would yield more than ten thousand. They didn’t. They won’t. Dick and Jane have either walked away, declared bankruptcy or fallen six months behind in their payments, never to catch up.
Okay, so I have a friend who works in Human Resources at a company in Santa Barbara that basically makes a product used to put out big, bad industrial fires. Last year was one of their best on record and yet she had to fire several employees over the last few months. Why? Because their publicly owned parent company, who we’ll call Bertha, had lost gobs of money they invested in their stock portfolio, which they use to service pensions. Bertha has to fund the pensions any way they can, even if it means letting people go in profitable subsidies of the corporation.
Bertha’s stock portfolio was ultimately decimated because Dick and Jane couldn’t repay The Bank of Bubba or The Bank of Chang, both of which are enormous financial institutions suddenly taking a nosedive. This created a lack of confidence in financial markets, the “henny-penny, the sky is falling!” scenario ensued, investors freaked and either sold stock or stopped buying, the market tanked and bye-bye ten years of $$ gain.
My husband has never traveled a lot during his current job, but now I can’t pay his boss to send him on a business trip (when I would then stay in my pajamas all day, read People magazine and turn on Oprah, serve the girls ice cream for dinner, stay up into the wee hours and watch chick flicks). Company wide cutbacks mean he doesn’t buy a plane ticket to Okeefanokee (the airlines lose money), he doesn’t book a hotel room (hotel loses revenue, fires two bell-boys from the night shift), doesn’t eat out at the Okeefanokee Café (they fire the sous chef and the dishwasher), and doesn’t buy souvenir trinkets at the airport for the girls (small companies like Trinkets ‘R Us watch their orders go way down and can no longer afford to buy health insurance for their twenty-four employees).
Dick and Jane can’t pay their mortgage so a teacher in Wisconsin loses her job because the sub prime loan fiasco has affected local and state governments. It wouldn’t be impossible to link the proliferation of Highway Patrol officers sitting around with speed guns back to Dick and Jane. Here in Los Angeles, our mayor has asked homicide detectives to reduce their overtime in the name of budget cuts. Traffic cops make less money than detectives and write revenue-generating tickets. It’s not a ridiculous suggestion.
I’ve got stacks of notes I want to touch upon here, but this will have to be part one of two or three parts. Eventually, I want to make a point that encourages us to steer the conversation regarding financial regulation. And by “us”, I don’t mean Democrats or Republicans. Individuals from every point on the ideological spectrum have been affected, even though Senate Republicans are the ones digging their heels in and refusing to even debate the issue. That’s insane.
More insanity to come in parts two and three. I’m going to get you as riled as I’ve become and together we’re going to make a bipartisan difference. (Okay, now I’m insane.)

Well, Sunday at my local park I was at an informal dog party (is there any other kind?) finishing my 3rd Krispy Kreme doughnut because I’m constitutionally incapable of eating less than two of them if they’re cold, four if they’re hot (Sunday, I split the difference) when it became time for party games. “Pin the tail on the donkey” was out of the question because dogs have that opposable thumb issue, but dancing is right up their alley. The rules were simple: dance with your dog. A judge then walked around to decide which pair deserved to be crowned the next Fred and Ginger. (Wow, that’s a dusty reference. How ‘bout Baby and Johnny?) My middle daughter danced with our dog Shelby, and the judge rewarded them with 1st prize: a squeaky chew toy. My daughter was proud. I was tickled, because only in L.A. does the judge at the dog birthday party end up being Dean McDermott of Tori Spelling fame.