(The following is an interview with an imaginary Republican congressman, Rick Offenbach, from Wisconsin.)
Daily Cup:
After Newtown, after the murder of 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary, the tide turned in favor of more gun control legislation. The thinking, from Democratic leaders and even some Republicans was, “Surely we can do something.” Now, almost four months after twenty 6- and 7-year-old children were gunned down in their classroom, new legislation to reduce gun violence is not only disappearing, but existing laws will possibly be weakened. Republicans in congress insist they will filibuster any attempt to infringe on 2nd Amendment rights. Dead children be damned. You were one of the most outspoken among them until…
Rep. Rick Offenbach:
Until my 12-year-old son was shot and killed at a baseball game.
Daily Cup:
I’m sorry for your loss. What happened?
Rep. Rick Offenbach:
His team was struggling so the coach was trying out different things. He pulled the starting shortstop and replaced him with my son. The other kid’s older brother, Nate, was…disabled. He used to play baseball himself but was hit in the head by a line drive while pitching a few years back. Suffered a TBI (traumatic brain injury). Couldn’t make much sense of life. When he saw his little brother sitting on the bench, I guess he got mad, thought he could do something about it. Showed up at a Saturday game last month and started shooting.
Daily Cup:
He killed the coach also.
Offenbach:
And an umpire. Then he killed himself. They always do, don’t they?
Daily Cup:
He used a Glock?
Offenbach:
With 30 rounds. Two other people were injured.
Daily Cup:
And so you think now some new gun laws might make a difference?
Offenbach:
I do.
Daily Cup:
Why were you so against them before? Politico reported that the only gun you’ve ever owned was a hunting rifle. New gun laws wouldn’t have affected you.
Offenbach:
I don’t like the government infringing on my rights.
Daily Cup:
No one does. But protections and regulations aren’t for punitive purposes. They’re to keep us safer. They don’t work all the time but –
Offenbach:
– I understand that now. That’s why I support them.
Daily Cup:
Because your son might be alive today –
Offenbach:
Maybe, yes — IF the shooter had to go through even a basic background check, but anyone can waltz into a gun show and walk out with a weapon. He drove to one a hundred miles away, bought himself a Glock. IF he hadn’t had so many bullets. He was a terrible shot. Out of the 30 rounds, there were only five victims.
Daily Cup:
But you’ve heard all the arguments the NRA makes, and successfully. You know what you’re up against. After Newtown, ninety percent of the country was behind new, extensive background check legislation and now we’re nowhere. We are spineless, shameful, and prosaic. Republican politicians, and a few Democrats, are more afraid of losing money and votes than they are of losing a loved one. Statistics from other states and other countries with stricter gun laws point to an effective means in keeping more people alive/less people dead due to gun violence. Forgive me for being insensitive, but you only flip-flopped because your son was killed.
At this point in the interview, Offenbach shut down. We sat in silence for several minutes until I saw his shoulders drop. He let out a long sigh.
Offenbach:
He was my only child. My wife is staying with her mother because she can’t look at me. She’s a part of that ninety percent. Thought I should support new gun laws.
Daily Cup:
It seems to me that the GOP leadership is incapable of empathy. They sympathized with the Newtown families but it’s not the same thing AT ALL, particularly if it only lasts five minutes. Because they lack the imagination to put themselves in another’s shoes, and the courage to say no to the gun lobby, we are no further in addressing gun violence in this country. What would you say to the comparisons being made between you and Senator Rob Portman of Ohio, who only came out in support of gay marriage after learning his own son was gay?
Offenbach:
I’d say personal experience is a powerful motivator.
Daily Cup:
But President Obama, the greater majority of the Democratic leadership and the citizens of this country are not motivated by personal experience. We’re motivated by empathy. Most of us have not been victims of gun violence. Most of us don’t have homosexual children. Most of us here in California are perfectly capable of driving and talking on the phone at the same time, but when presented with statistics that showed we’d be safer as a whole if we switched exclusively to hands-free, collectively we accepted new rules. How can we convince the GOP to be leaders in sensible new gun legislation – not because of tragic personal experience – but through empathy?
Offenbach:
I’m not sure. Most of my colleagues have expressed sorrow for my loss while avoiding eye contact with me. I had a friend diagnosed with pancreatic cancer a few years back and I made excuses constantly why I couldn’t see him. Heck, I couldn’t even call him because I was afraid that by acknowledging what he was going through, by being with him…like it was contagious or something. So I suppose you’re right. We’re afraid to be empathetic. If they look me in the eye, they’ll have to feel some of what I feel, including the guilt of all the money we’ve taken from the gun lobby.
Daily Cup:
In 1980, California mother Candy Lightner buried her 13-year-old daughter who’d been killed by a drunk driver. She started MADD and the estimated 30,000 drunk driving deaths that year have been reduced nearly in half, twenty-five years later. Change takes time. New gun control legislation – NOT punitive measures taken upon gun owners – won’t erase gun violence but it can certainly reduce it, more and more as time goes by. The next Adam Lanza, Jared Loughner, or James Holmes may not have been born yet. But in eighteen years, or twenty, if he goes to buy a gun and can’t, or can but not a large magazine, less people will die, including maybe someone’s son out playing baseball. Does that sound about right to you?
Offenbach:
It does. My colleagues have to look me in the eye when they tell me there’s nothing we can do. I predict several of them won’t be able to, enough that we can tip the congressional balance in favor of sensible legislation, starting with universal background checks.
Daily Cup:
I hope you’re right. Thank you for talking with me.
Offenbach:
Of course.
Read these articles:
Republicans Still Not Ready for Gun Control, Plotting Filibuster Instead by Joe Coscarelli
Don’t Know Much About Gun Laws by Joel Benenson and Katie Connolly
Armed Correlations by Adam Gopnik
The Second Amendment is All For Gun Control by Adam Winkler
Congress is back this week from their break (because they work so hard and effectively) and will address new gun control legislation. At this point, the gun lobby is winning in ways they could only imagine in their dreams. If only they could imagine losing a loved one to gun violence. Call Congress. Here’s how.